Crysis 1.0 vs Patch 1.1
Aquà les traigo una minicomparativa con y sin el patch 1.1 que elaboré.
Todo fue corrido en Windows Vista de 32 bits, DX10, eVGA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 MB stock, C2D e6300 OC @3.01 GHz, 2 GB Gskill DDR2 OC @860 MHz, Gigabyte GA965P-S3, Western Digital PATA (IDE) 80 GB.
Drivers: ForceWare 169.09 beta.
Casi todo lo corrà en Very High.
Crysis v1.0
1280×960
Cita:
| 23/11/2007 19:39:02 - Vista Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu DX10 1280×960, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen Demo Loop=3, Time Of Day= 9 Global Game Quality: Custom Custom Quality Values: VolumetricEffects=VeryHigh Texture=Medium ObjectDetail=Medium Sound=VeryHigh Shadows=Medium Water=VeryHigh Physics=VeryHigh Particles=VeryHigh Shading=VeryHigh PostProcessing=VeryHigh GameEffects=VeryHigh ================================================== ============ TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s) !TimeDemo Run 0 Finished. Play Time: 136.17s, Average FPS: 14.69 Min FPS: 11.51 at frame 140, Max FPS: 18.32 at frame 1187 Average Tri/Sec: 12128343, Tri/Frame: 825763 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.11 !TimeDemo Run 1 Finished. Play Time: 122.71s, Average FPS: 16.30 Min FPS: 11.51 at frame 140, Max FPS: 18.88 at frame 1720 Average Tri/Sec: 13671653, Tri/Frame: 838832 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.09 !TimeDemo Run 2 Finished. Play Time: 122.60s, Average FPS: 16.31 Min FPS: 11.51 at frame 140, Max FPS: 18.88 at frame 1720 Average Tri/Sec: 13671923, Tri/Frame: 838104 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.09 TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed) ================================================== ============ Completed All Tests <><><><><><><><><><><><><>>–SUMMARY–<<><><><><><><><><><><><><> 23/11/2007 19:39:02 - Vista Run #1- DX10 1280×960 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: Custom ~~ Overall Average FPS: 1630,5 |
Crysis v1.1
1280×960
Cita:
| 08/01/2008 16:27:41 - Vista Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu DX10 1280×960, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen Demo Loop=3, Time Of Day= 9 Global Game Quality: Custom Custom Quality Values: VolumetricEffects=VeryHigh Texture=Medium ObjectDetail=Medium Sound=VeryHigh Shadows=Medium Water=VeryHigh Physics=VeryHigh Particles=VeryHigh Shading=VeryHigh PostProcessing=VeryHigh GameEffects=VeryHigh ================================================== ============ TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s) !TimeDemo Run 0 Finished. Play Time: 122.34s, Average FPS: 16.35 Min FPS: 9.90 at frame 154, Max FPS: 20.62 at frame 1752 Average Tri/Sec: 13501484, Tri/Frame: 825889 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.11 !TimeDemo Run 1 Finished. Play Time: 105.12s, Average FPS: 19.03 Min FPS: 9.90 at frame 154, Max FPS: 20.62 at frame 1752 Average Tri/Sec: 15915040, Tri/Frame: 836502 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.10 !TimeDemo Run 2 Finished. Play Time: 104.92s, Average FPS: 19.06 Min FPS: 9.90 at frame 154, Max FPS: 20.62 at frame 1752 Average Tri/Sec: 15925238, Tri/Frame: 835473 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.10 TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed) ================================================== ============ Completed All Tests <><><><><><><><><><><><><>>–SUMMARY–<<><><><><><><><><><><><><> 08/01/2008 16:27:41 - Vista Run #1- DX10 1280×960 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: Custom ~~ Overall Average FPS: 1904,5 |
Crysis v1.0
1280×720
Cita:
| 23/11/2007 20:31:24 - Vista Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu DX10 1280×720, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen Demo Loop=2, Time Of Day= 9 Global Game Quality: Custom Custom Quality Values: VolumetricEffects=VeryHigh Texture=Medium ObjectDetail=Medium Sound=VeryHigh Shadows=Medium Water=VeryHigh Physics=VeryHigh Particles=VeryHigh Shading=VeryHigh PostProcessing=VeryHigh GameEffects=VeryHigh ================================================== ============ TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s) !TimeDemo Run 0 Finished. Play Time: 106.85s, Average FPS: 18.72 Min FPS: 14.59 at frame 154, Max FPS: 22.97 at frame 1721 Average Tri/Sec: 17947570, Tri/Frame: 958888 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.96 !TimeDemo Run 1 Finished. Play Time: 100.22s, Average FPS: 19.96 Min FPS: 14.59 at frame 154, Max FPS: 22.97 at frame 1721 Average Tri/Sec: 19393946, Tri/Frame: 971861 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.94 TimeDemo Play Ended, (2 Runs Performed) ================================================== ============ Completed All Tests <><><><><><><><><><><><><>>–SUMMARY–<<><><><><><><><><><><><><> 23/11/2007 20:31:24 - Vista Run #1- DX10 1280×720 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: Custom ~~ Last Average FPS: 19.96 |
Crysis v1.1
1280×720
Cita:
| 08/01/2008 16:54:45 - Vista Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu DX10 1280×720, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen Demo Loop=2, Time Of Day= 9 Global Game Quality: Custom Custom Quality Values: VolumetricEffects=VeryHigh Texture=Medium ObjectDetail=Medium Sound=VeryHigh Shadows=Medium Water=VeryHigh Physics=VeryHigh Particles=VeryHigh Shading=VeryHigh PostProcessing=VeryHigh GameEffects=VeryHigh ================================================== ============ TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s) !TimeDemo Run 0 Finished. Play Time: 101.47s, Average FPS: 19.71 Min FPS: 7.76 at frame 117, Max FPS: 25.77 at frame 1749 Average Tri/Sec: 18889462, Tri/Frame: 958384 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.96 !TimeDemo Run 1 Finished. Play Time: 85.29s, Average FPS: 23.45 Min FPS: 7.76 at frame 117, Max FPS: 26.26 at frame 73 Average Tri/Sec: 22777568, Tri/Frame: 971293 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.94 TimeDemo Play Ended, (2 Runs Performed) ================================================== ============ Completed All Tests <><><><><><><><><><><><><>>–SUMMARY–<<><><><><><><><><><><><><> 08/01/2008 16:54:45 - Vista Run #1- DX10 1280×720 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: Custom ~~ Last Average FPS: 23.45 |
Como verán, la diferencia de FPS en PROMEDIO, ES PERCEPTIBLE, además yo aprecié una gran estabilidad en los FPS, ya no eran tan notorios los bajones de FPS, casi todo el tiempo se mantuvo a la misma tas ade frames, y acoto que se veÃa más suave la fluidez.
Conclusión: Con drivers beta más nuevos, porque sé que los mÃos no son muy nuevos pero son buenos, estoy conciente que habrá mayor rendimiento.
NOTA: La comparativa es claro que con versión 1.0 fue en el 2007, pero aclaro que use los mismos drivers, por eso aun conservo los 169.09 beta.
Espero que les sea informativo esto.
